cavity 发表于 2025-3-23 12:22:48

Tensions within Marriage: Public Institution or Private Choice?r highlights the tensions between marriage as a fundamental social institution with a formal, legal and religious status regulated by public opinion and norms and marriage as a form of emotional bonding chosen by two autonomous individuals. Even though marriage and relationships are now in many ways

Cardioversion 发表于 2025-3-23 14:40:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_12.png

肮脏 发表于 2025-3-23 19:51:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_13.png

Detonate 发表于 2025-3-24 01:32:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_14.png

熔岩 发表于 2025-3-24 05:29:13

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_15.png

残废的火焰 发表于 2025-3-24 10:24:26

Conclusions: Reinventing Marriage?oting the well-being of children. There are, of course, no simple solutions to the problem of relationship instability, because any policy initiative will be dealing with intricate layers of people’s emotional and social lives.

inculpate 发表于 2025-3-24 11:10:01

The Fractional Analysis Method,icy issue — particularly in the US — there is no single cure or magic potion which offers a panacea for dealing with the changes in people’s personal relationships. Neither public policy nor private institutions can revive marriage as . socially sanctioned institution for love, sex and reproduction.

禁令 发表于 2025-3-24 15:46:13

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_18.png

没花的是打扰 发表于 2025-3-24 21:47:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_19.png

眨眼 发表于 2025-3-25 02:18:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387717/387717_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Governments and Marriage Education Policy; Perspectives from th Elizabeth Acker Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publi