CRACK
发表于 2025-3-23 10:09:17
Governing the Use-of-Force in International Relations978-1-137-41144-0Series ISSN 2731-0329 Series E-ISSN 2731-0337
许可
发表于 2025-3-23 14:56:55
2731-0329 ministrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation.978-1-349-48925-1978-1-137-41144-0Series ISSN 2731-0329 Series E-ISSN 2731-0337
生存环境
发表于 2025-3-23 18:18:01
Book 2014This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates the extent to which the Bush and Obama administrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation.
ALIAS
发表于 2025-3-24 00:51:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387661/387661_14.png
暂时别动
发表于 2025-3-24 03:24:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387661/387661_15.png
暂时休息
发表于 2025-3-24 09:07:30
The International Legal Paradigm: The UN Charter , Regime,at included the legal justification for military engagement -specifically on the conditions for the use-of-force — and the nature in which prisoners of war could be captured, questioned and tried.. In appearing to “straighten up” the United States’ international reputation, the election of Democrati
休闲
发表于 2025-3-24 11:29:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387661/387661_17.png
伪造者
发表于 2025-3-24 15:38:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387661/387661_18.png
Expiration
发表于 2025-3-24 22:44:29
Bush and the Use-of-Force,, the controversial documents made two significant declarations. First, “WMD — nuclear, biological, and chemical — in the possession of hostile states and terrorists represent one of the greatest security challenges facing the US.”. Second, “ur enemies have openly declared that they are seeking W
frozen-shoulder
发表于 2025-3-24 23:33:19
Obama and the Use-of-Force,m office. However, there is no question that it has impacted the debate over the rules governing the use-of-force in the context of Obama and will continue to do so in the years to come. If one considers the actions of the Obama administration, it would appear that while such interpretation has been