擦试不掉
发表于 2025-3-28 15:54:50
rime ministers in a coalition context will almost certainly have a different personality from those who become prime ministers in single-party majority governments: in coalitions, the main skills required will probably be diplomacy and compromise, while strong leadership may be more at a premium in
赞美者
发表于 2025-3-28 20:58:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387646/387646_42.png
Occipital-Lobe
发表于 2025-3-29 00:23:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387646/387646_43.png
Anterior
发表于 2025-3-29 05:58:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387646/387646_44.png
武器
发表于 2025-3-29 11:14:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387646/387646_45.png
威胁你
发表于 2025-3-29 11:49:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3877/387646/387646_46.png
拥护
发表于 2025-3-29 17:15:25
Dumitru Motreanu,Patrick WinkertAlmost as soon as parties emerged, the assessment of the impact of these bodies on the composition, functioning, structure, and output of cabinets was a subject of concern and controversy. This impact is so marked that cabinet government is indeed often described as being party government:.
BIBLE
发表于 2025-3-29 21:49:18
Mathematics and Mechanics - The InterplayCabinet decision-making is small-group decision-making. The system is therefore structurally and functionally more flexible than parliamentary or bureaucratic decision-making. Cabinets can shift their focus of interest and vary their agenda-formation process horizontally and vertically according to both short- and long-term developments.
你不公正
发表于 2025-3-30 00:50:41
The Links between Cabinets and Parties and Cabinet Decision-MakingAlmost as soon as parties emerged, the assessment of the impact of these bodies on the composition, functioning, structure, and output of cabinets was a subject of concern and controversy. This impact is so marked that cabinet government is indeed often described as being party government:.
CRUE
发表于 2025-3-30 04:17:58
ConclusionCabinet decision-making is small-group decision-making. The system is therefore structurally and functionally more flexible than parliamentary or bureaucratic decision-making. Cabinets can shift their focus of interest and vary their agenda-formation process horizontally and vertically according to both short- and long-term developments.