臭名昭著
发表于 2025-3-23 12:34:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387214/387214_11.png
美色花钱
发表于 2025-3-23 17:04:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1493-6K’s case for solipsism is a formidable one. But, as we shall see, it can be overthrown by some of the considerations set out earlier in the book.
stroke
发表于 2025-3-23 21:43:20
,A Modal Argument for God’s Existence,Consider the following argument for God’s existence.
CANON
发表于 2025-3-24 00:38:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387214/387214_14.png
低三下四之人
发表于 2025-3-24 05:51:47
Parodies,The supremely perfect being of the last chapter is, of course, identical with the maximally great being of Chapter 1. Hence, the former would be necessarily absolutely great, i.e. no other supremely perfect being is possible.
Arresting
发表于 2025-3-24 07:01:48
A Proof of the Logical Possibility of God,At this point, it may look as if . is much more credible than proof ., since . does not commit its defender to proving that God’s existence is logically possible. But this is mere appearance: . provides us with a model for such a possibility proof, as follows.
Bereavement
发表于 2025-3-24 10:54:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387214/387214_17.png
小卒
发表于 2025-3-24 17:25:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387214/387214_18.png
Gerontology
发表于 2025-3-24 21:48:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6672-8o abolish suffering and a perfectly good being . abolish it; hence, no being is both omnipotent and perfectly good, i.e. a maximally great being does not exist.’ In view of ., . and ., we have reason to believe that this argument is unsound. However, as we shall see, it is no simple matter to discov
一致性
发表于 2025-3-25 02:47:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387214/387214_20.png