Incise
发表于 2025-3-28 16:59:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3871/387036/387036_41.png
induct
发表于 2025-3-28 20:19:36
Developments in Leadership Thinking,hich the surface patches have the same inclination towards the observer provided she looked at it from the corresponding vantage point. Surface patches above and below that curve would appear at a different distance away or towards her.
归功于
发表于 2025-3-29 01:48:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3871/387036/387036_43.png
无瑕疵
发表于 2025-3-29 06:24:03
Book 2020s heritage and re-forms it in the present through the concepts of form and image. The latter are to be understood as structural elements of a new cultural grammar able to make the late modern world intelligible. In particular, compared to the original Goethean project, but also to C.P. Snow‘s idea o
Feigned
发表于 2025-3-29 09:00:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3871/387036/387036_45.png
patriarch
发表于 2025-3-29 15:21:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3871/387036/387036_46.png
发生
发表于 2025-3-29 16:49:43
Carlos Losada,Yuliya Ponomarevae terms and to define its scope broadly by understanding it as the place where the semantics of . are defined and where they are connected to a reference .. The central link in the field of . is .-., and it refers to those dynamics of the . and to the . that have taken hold in late modernity and tha
MUT
发表于 2025-3-29 23:08:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01980-8the detection of similarity or common features across domains. Drawing an . between the domains . and . means: to ascertain that . has the same features as . under some known respects, to find that . has one further feature ., and to discover or to conjecture that . has the feature .* similar to . o
IRK
发表于 2025-3-30 03:54:09
Leading for High Performance in Asia Thom who first introduced such a term. It is necessary, however, to remember that Thom thought that it was first introduced by the American mathematician Steven Smale, “although Smale says it was Thom that coined the neologism “.”
培养
发表于 2025-3-30 06:19:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-22731-6plain why some key terms belonging to Foucault’s conceptual toolbox have been creatively used, twisted, altered, and, of course, misunderstood in many different contexts, whereas some of the latter have nothing to do with the philosophical realm within which they arose. The notion of . is one of the