COLON 发表于 2025-3-27 00:01:10
Confusing Culture, Polysemous Diversity: “Culture” and “Cultural Diversity” in and after the Conventon provided space for the several other, more common, understandings of the term. This assemblage of meanings includes several strands of the broad “anthropological” idea of cultural diversity, aesthetic readings of it as well as “cultural and creative industries” understandings. This is the principcoagulation 发表于 2025-3-27 03:13:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386949/386949_32.pngNoisome 发表于 2025-3-27 08:08:44
The “Culture and Trade” Paradox Reloadedehensive approach in various attempts to successfully tackle the problems discussed in the course of the trade-linkage debate (Garcia, 1998a) — a debate addressing various individual “trade and […] problems” as outlined above with a view of realizing the reconciliation between their respective polic走路左晃右晃 发表于 2025-3-27 10:49:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386949/386949_34.pngDisk199 发表于 2025-3-27 16:05:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386949/386949_35.png高调 发表于 2025-3-27 20:31:16
A. van Wersch,J. Eberhardt,F. Stringernd perspectives on media and cultural diversity in global trade within UNESCO and WTO. In tracing the development of different perspectives on trade and culture, we reconstruct the history of the WTO/UNESCO interinstitutional dialectics by focusing on a number of milestone events and debates. Drawin令人心醉 发表于 2025-3-28 01:41:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386949/386949_37.pngFoolproof 发表于 2025-3-28 02:25:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5277-2dable aims, but as a potential basis for inspiring the kind of cultural work necessary to remake national and global civilization in a way congruent with other major declarations of the UN, including its founding Charter and, very significantly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the varipericardium 发表于 2025-3-28 06:31:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386949/386949_39.pngantedate 发表于 2025-3-28 10:33:44
Roberto Grassi,Graziella Di Greziaal institutions. The emergent global issues of culture, cultural identity, and cultural expressions therefore, need some historical context. Without this context, the vocabulary of the UNESCO Convention seems technocratic, limited to debates between commerce versus culture, and devoid of connections to historical trends.