完全
发表于 2025-3-25 05:32:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_21.png
Wernickes-area
发表于 2025-3-25 10:12:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_22.png
APRON
发表于 2025-3-25 11:58:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_23.png
碎石
发表于 2025-3-25 17:38:22
Introduction: Reflections on the Demise and Renewal of Utopia in a Global Agend, thirdly, it involves thinking and acting so as to prevent the foreclosure of political possibilities in the present and future. The perspective adopted in this book is that the question of how to anticipate and imagine communities that ‘do not yet exist’ animates many critical socio-political engagements with contemporary globalization.
史前
发表于 2025-3-25 20:14:01
Introduction: Reflections on the Demise and Renewal of Utopia in a Global Aget which does not yet exist’ (Deleuze, 1994, p. 147)? This question lies at the heart of utopianism. To be utopian, we suggest, is the stuff of politics, and it first involves subjecting the politics of the present to critique. Secondly, it involves imagining human communities that do not yet exist a
返老还童
发表于 2025-3-26 00:52:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_26.png
Admonish
发表于 2025-3-26 06:39:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_27.png
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-26 11:19:07
Globalization, Reflexive Utopianism, and the Cosmopolitan Social Imaginary1991, p. 1). But utopia is more than an alternative society. More importantly, as Ernst Bloch recognized, utopia conveys a powerful impulse or drive that is simultaneously critical of present sociopolitical realities and anticipatory of positive alternative futures. It is a basic human aspiration, t
LANCE
发表于 2025-3-26 15:43:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3870/386905/386905_29.png
思想流动
发表于 2025-3-26 17:39:34
Postsecularism: A New Global Debate fully understand the process of globalization, and as part of that process, many now think that the social sciences must be vigorously ‘provincialized’. Their public purpose and their typical categories must strenuously be re-examined in the light of ‘multiple modernities’ and ‘plural knowledges’.