GENRE 发表于 2025-3-26 23:35:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_31.png粗鲁的人 发表于 2025-3-27 02:01:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_32.pngevaculate 发表于 2025-3-27 08:18:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_33.pngANN 发表于 2025-3-27 10:11:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_34.pngGULLY 发表于 2025-3-27 17:03:15
Kommunale Selbstverwaltung und Finanzen, many to be the most important, namely: need, efficiency, and entitlement. Unfortunately, his positive theory of distributive justice does not go so far as to provide a rank ordering of these three norms. Most survey respondents concluded that the relative importance of these standards depended on c钝剑 发表于 2025-3-27 20:49:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08632-1obility and the wealthy became common items of consumption for ordinary people, thanks in large part to the massive drop in the cost of producing them. In our digital age, we have the possibility of an era of mass technological creativity. A strategy of need satisfaction ensures a stable source of s有角 发表于 2025-3-28 00:33:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95542-553) who argues that justice in both the acquisition and transfer of properties entitles their proprietors to receive whatever is their due from ownership of such holdings. Societal output ought to be divided according to what people bring to the marketplace and what they contribute.树木心 发表于 2025-3-28 03:44:21
,Wegerecht und ländlicher Straßenbau,t is the appropriate criterion to use for distributive justice? Is it efficiency, need, contribution, entitlement, equality, effort, or ability? Globalization has only compounded the complexity of these unresolved questions. Discourse on globalization and distributive justice can be particularly fruDebility 发表于 2025-3-28 09:49:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_39.pngBADGE 发表于 2025-3-28 12:37:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3869/386862/386862_40.png