Tractable 发表于 2025-3-23 12:02:14
Introduction,ok provides a case study of Uber, perhaps the most amblematic company of the sharing economy, from a legal perspective. Legal experts from nine different countries contributed to the project, analyzing legal challenges faced in their jurisdictions.软弱 发表于 2025-3-23 15:59:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386478/386478_12.pngnullify 发表于 2025-3-23 21:45:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386478/386478_13.pngnuclear-tests 发表于 2025-3-23 22:21:24
Capital Budgeting and Investment Decisions congestion, universal service, and safety regulation; the status of drivers; and emerging issues of data privacy. But the rapid transition has resulted in more open and competitive markets across the USA.观察 发表于 2025-3-24 03:06:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-82604-6dicatory developments to examine if this different treatment is justified and will identify certain loopholes in this regulation which can lead to conclude that the purported differences are inexistent.Ceremony 发表于 2025-3-24 06:34:59
Michael Demuth,Henrik Bustorf,Olaf Thiel drivers and questions whether this is an employment relationship. The following section deals with consumer protection and civil liability whereas the last two sections pertain to antitrust and tax issues.GLIDE 发表于 2025-3-24 11:20:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386478/386478_17.png暂停,间歇 发表于 2025-3-24 17:36:28
A Conceptual Overview of Legal Challenges Posed by Uber, is to discuss the existing and possible disruptive effects caused by Uber’s business model that has triggered an economic, social, and most importantly legal phenomenon. This chapter will thus lay out the conceptual framework of the legal challenges that will be examined in the following case-study chapters of this book.GILD 发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386478/386478_19.png脱水 发表于 2025-3-25 01:32:28
Deregulation of Public Transportation Services: Can Uber Accomplish the Task?,dicatory developments to examine if this different treatment is justified and will identify certain loopholes in this regulation which can lead to conclude that the purported differences are inexistent.