MUMP
发表于 2025-3-25 06:27:35
Book 2023v Pakistan, Juliana v United States of America, Future Generations v Colombia) are used to examine how actors not formally recognized as subjects of international law (re)interpret national and international law and thereby contribute to the constitutionalisation of the international climate law regime..
愉快吗
发表于 2025-3-25 11:06:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3862/386137/386137_22.png
SOBER
发表于 2025-3-25 15:19:41
Imaging in High Energy Astronomyon of CCL as an opportunity for non-state actors to engage in international constitutional lawmaking. It argues that plaintiffs of CCL cases can ‘force the court to engage in (a legal dialogue)’ in which they can present their interpretations regarding states’ obligations in the face of the climate
entreat
发表于 2025-3-25 16:50:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3862/386137/386137_24.png
anthropologist
发表于 2025-3-25 22:02:28
Introduction,on of CCL as an opportunity for non-state actors to engage in international constitutional lawmaking. It argues that plaintiffs of CCL cases can ‘force the court to engage in (a legal dialogue)’ in which they can present their interpretations regarding states’ obligations in the face of the climate
恶心
发表于 2025-3-26 02:20:21
The Role of the Courts in CCL, change and creating new constitutional rights, such as the right to a stable climate or the concept of an ecological subsistence minimum. However, a closer look at the role of judicial lawmaking reveals that the powers are not as separated as is often claimed. This raises questions of the limitatio
完全
发表于 2025-3-26 08:13:06
Book 2023 change as a global problem. The constitutionalisation of international climate law is supposed to ensure greater participation of non-state actors such as NGOs or individuals and a rollback of state sovereignty where states do not care about meeting their climate commitments. This book addresses th
争论
发表于 2025-3-26 11:48:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3862/386137/386137_28.png
车床
发表于 2025-3-26 15:47:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12354-3o-legal perspective, how non-state actors can create their own "civil" constitutional law or contribute to the development of new human rights. Such a multiplicity of coexisting constitutional orders raises questions of authority and unity in international law, which are critically analysed under the prism of constitutional pluralism.
Fulminate
发表于 2025-3-26 19:31:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3862/386137/386137_30.png