Libido
发表于 2025-3-23 12:46:02
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981528re. Why is it that the question of the intellectual became so urgent suddenly in the late nineteenth century? And why has remained so today? Why do modern societies seem to have a need for such a term, even if the concept is by no means clear?
Interferons
发表于 2025-3-23 14:02:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3860/385992/385992_12.png
使激动
发表于 2025-3-23 21:17:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3860/385992/385992_13.png
ensemble
发表于 2025-3-24 00:51:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3860/385992/385992_14.png
Negotiate
发表于 2025-3-24 04:10:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3860/385992/385992_15.png
Bravado
发表于 2025-3-24 06:46:07
Overview: Addresses the representation of the economic, political, and cultural interrelations between agents involved in the process of intellectual activity. Analyzes the transformation in intellectual production and the changing role of academics themselves.978-1-349-29819-8978-1-137-01493-1
Confirm
发表于 2025-3-24 14:46:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3860/385992/385992_17.png
Guileless
发表于 2025-3-24 18:23:41
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014931community; Cultural Studies; ethics; learning; Nation; philosophy; service; transformation; violence
业余爱好者
发表于 2025-3-24 22:20:38
Introductionrole of nation in shaping the culture and the role of culture in sustaining the nation-state. This relationship is not “natural”; it is historically produced and traceable in cultural practices. Therefore, to pay attention to discourse is essential because the nation-state and the colonial order it
Flatter
发表于 2025-3-24 23:47:54
From Rational to Relevant: What Counts as “Public” Knowledge?sible to almost all living people” (Kitcher 1208–9). In 1927, John Dewey warned us that the most critical “problems” of “the public” would be the twin legacies of technology, an explosion of information and a corresponding decline in public dialogue. As the need to listen grows, so shrinks the time