cardiac-arrest
发表于 2025-3-25 06:44:16
Book 19981st editionesponsibilities of geneticists towards future generations, raiseintriguing ethical and legal questions, as well as important policyissues. As much as any set of issues, they reflect the hopes andfears, prejudices and uncertainties that people associate withgerm-line intervention and the future of human kind.
START
发表于 2025-3-25 08:19:45
Europe, the Crisis, and the Internetunique human genetic inheritance, free from any engineered alterations” (Agius 1994, p. 310), is indefensible, at least in general secular terms. In deed, if one endorses the first principle, namely, that one ensure the existence of future generations, this first principle will plausibly entail alte
majestic
发表于 2025-3-25 12:50:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3844/384314/384314_23.png
CHASE
发表于 2025-3-25 18:23:18
s much as any set of issues, they reflect the hopes andfears, prejudices and uncertainties that people associate withgerm-line intervention and the future of human kind.978-94-010-6164-3978-94-011-5149-8
旅行路线
发表于 2025-3-25 22:03:48
Patenting Life: Our Responsibilities to Present and Future Generations
Facet-Joints
发表于 2025-3-26 02:32:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3844/384314/384314_26.png
轻触
发表于 2025-3-26 05:56:34
Germ-Line Intervention and Our Responsibilities to Future Generations978-94-011-5149-8
Eructation
发表于 2025-3-26 12:11:01
Screening for Genetic Diseases: What are the Moral Constraints?ocedure, the inevitable question is how will these procedures be applied. The inevitable and much debated answer is eugenics. It is often looked upon as positive eugenics, directed perhaps, towards achieving human beings endowed with optimal characteristics of physical strength and beauty, intellect
使人入神
发表于 2025-3-26 12:37:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3844/384314/384314_29.png
interrupt
发表于 2025-3-26 17:34:57
Moral Reasoning in Bioethics and Posteritygical and the teleological perspectives. These two approaches are usually distinguished on the basis of two opposing views: while teleological argumentation as commonly understood affirms that we have to evaluate each action primarily by analyzing its consequences and the end to which it aims, deont