废止
发表于 2025-3-25 05:50:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384021/384021_21.png
Host142
发表于 2025-3-25 08:55:38
Samuel TalcottFills a gap in the market: Few books explore the relationship between Georges Canguilhem and Michel Foucault, despite the significance of the relationship and Canguilhem’s influence on Foucault’s thou
Priapism
发表于 2025-3-25 12:04:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384021/384021_23.png
贞洁
发表于 2025-3-25 17:23:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384021/384021_24.png
Mercurial
发表于 2025-3-25 23:53:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9hat drove these changes. Beginning from his vehement attacks on vitalist philosophy, I argue that his reading of Alain’s . together with the school of human geography led him to an enduring appreciation of such philosophy, no longer as a false, bellicose doctrine, but a belief attuned to life in par
软膏
发表于 2025-3-26 01:06:07
Adjustment Disorders in Health,s of the problem of error and argues that he partially transforms these through his encounter with human suffering and sickness. In both his genealogy of a thesis in positivist medicine and his own account of sickness and health, error as mistake is replaced by an interest in the role confusion and
新手
发表于 2025-3-26 06:41:27
American Civil Liberties Union,is 1952 homage to Alain, I show, he found that both philosophers began an effort to understand creation without falling into the trap of Platonism. Ultimately, I show why Canguilhem thought Alain’s approach to the problem of error is superior to Bergson’s, but that neither theorizes creation without
绅士
发表于 2025-3-26 10:49:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384021/384021_28.png
DUCE
发表于 2025-3-26 16:42:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384021/384021_29.png
llibretto
发表于 2025-3-26 18:04:30
Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologiesical anthropology as an attempted extension of Canguilhem’s work. I find Canguilhem’s response in his return to René Leriche. Whereas Dagognet implies that medicine’s empiricism arises from its impotence before nature and conceals clinical knowledge of man, Canguilhem questions humanist medicine by