progestogen
发表于 2025-3-30 12:15:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0003-4er’s significant contributions to Smith scholarship as well as Stigler’s use of Adam Smith’s analytical insights in his (Stigler’s own work). The paper argues that while Stigler’s assessment of Smith’s analytical achievements in economics is largely a success, his blindness to Smith’s moral philosop
欢呼
发表于 2025-3-30 13:42:49
Reference work 2016Latest editionount, ought to help readers appreciate what is distant from their understanding, to appreciate what the author knows but the reader does not. Stigler drew attention to Smith’s failure to apply self-interested considerations to his theory of policy. We ask whether this apparent gap was Smith’s fault
口味
发表于 2025-3-30 17:10:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0n in terms of marginalist theory. This confirms Piero Sraffa’s observation that by the end of the nineteenth century the analytical structure, content and genuine significance of the classical theory had been “submerged and forgotten”. However, Stigler’s textual acuteness allows him to discover irri