Cougar 发表于 2025-3-25 07:06:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_21.png薄膜 发表于 2025-3-25 09:00:11
radical, Orwell, cannot. Embarking upon a kind of biographical-political-cultural-literary criticism, this book brings the radical eccentrics‘ vital, potentially transformative conversation to the attention of scholars of English literature for the first time, suggesting fascinating new approaches to the stu978-1-349-73266-1978-1-137-04373-3巧办法 发表于 2025-3-25 14:28:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04373-3English literature; gender; George Orwell; history of literature; literary criticism; politics; time; BritiDirected 发表于 2025-3-25 18:45:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_24.pngcallous 发表于 2025-3-25 23:39:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_25.pngouter-ear 发表于 2025-3-26 02:23:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_26.png裁决 发表于 2025-3-26 07:31:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8166-0ue a doctorate in philosophy at the University of London. Anand has often told the story of his passage in the mid-1920s from the streets of the Punjab to the squares of Bloomsbury, but he has rarely commented in any detail on his career at the BBC, his friendships with George Orwell, Stevie Smith,Fulsome 发表于 2025-3-26 09:44:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_28.png无节奏 发表于 2025-3-26 13:17:20
Wolfgang Immerschitt,Marcus Stumpfhis East End community, grew into a man whose most passionate wish was “to get into the fight against everything he hated” (172). The things he hates include Mosley’s anti-Semitic fascists, Hitlers Nazis, English snobs, capitalist exploiters— the list of evils is almost as long as Orwell’s. Yet despSupplement 发表于 2025-3-26 18:36:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384010/384010_30.png