粗糙 发表于 2025-3-23 10:33:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_11.pngoncologist 发表于 2025-3-23 17:47:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_12.png雪上轻舟飞过 发表于 2025-3-23 21:19:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_13.png人充满活力 发表于 2025-3-23 23:06:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_14.png厨师 发表于 2025-3-24 04:27:52
The Animal According to Berkeley’s immaterialism must not necessarily lead to a denial of the capacity of any animal to perceive exterior objects, since perception supposes a reflective activity of the mind and Berkeley seems to deny any such activity to animals.丑恶 发表于 2025-3-24 10:26:48
Book 2011eley’s life and thought; in fact, he always considered himself a pioneer called to think and do new things. He was an empiricist well versed in the sciences, an amateur of the mechanical arts, as well as a metaphysician; he was the author of many completely different discoveries, as well as a very aphotophobia 发表于 2025-3-24 14:42:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_17.png慢慢啃 发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0691-8ng that Berkeley is an instrumentalist about some things and not about others. Lisa Downing, for instance, has argued that Berkeley is an instrumentalist about forces but not about corpuscles, and Douglas Jesseph contends that Berkeley rejects mathematical instrumentalism despite being a stronger instrumentalist in the sciences.温和女人 发表于 2025-3-24 19:50:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383969/383969_19.pngSKIFF 发表于 2025-3-25 00:34:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9243-4Berkeley; Enlightenment; George Berkeley; Hume; Newton; Philosophers of Money; Siris; Spinoza; Spinozist; ber