图画文字 发表于 2025-3-26 21:50:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_31.png相容 发表于 2025-3-27 01:37:19
Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski living disciple of Marx; others again that he is one of the most knowledgeable of the living Hegelians.. From these claims alone one could infer that Lukács is a synthetic exponent of the two nineteenth century thinkers who in so many ways dominate various trends of thought in the present century.扔掉掐死你 发表于 2025-3-27 08:27:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_33.pngRetrieval 发表于 2025-3-27 11:35:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_34.pngGLUT 发表于 2025-3-27 16:04:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05761-9ant Marxists (with Lenin and Antonio Gramsci) to claim that authentic Marxism is elitist; but, he surpasses all in his bluntness. Lukács’ theory of the proletarian ruling class is on one hand an enlargement on his own early views about the “hero” — the gnostic activist — in whom essence comes to lifdefeatist 发表于 2025-3-27 20:45:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_36.pngRobust 发表于 2025-3-28 01:23:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00603-8als certain hitherto little noticed features of Marxian Communism. Lukács defines the revolution, and the organization which is to realize it, in a peculiar manner. This peculiarity is not due to the unorthodoxy of his views, to their departure from what the Marxian texts demand; rather it is connecfrenzy 发表于 2025-3-28 04:21:51
K. Abraham,G. Halbroth,E. Künzell. Lukács’ “form” disintegrated under the pressures of his spiritual problems and he transcended the essay. Understanding the significance of this disintegration of “form” in Lukács’ intellectual development will help us understand the nature and origin of his Marxism which grows out of it.连锁 发表于 2025-3-28 09:24:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_39.png逃避责任 发表于 2025-3-28 10:29:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383953/383953_40.png