ELUDE
发表于 2025-3-25 04:12:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3823/382249/382249_21.png
暖昧关系
发表于 2025-3-25 10:27:19
Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals,I would like to start with reviewing some of the basic intuitions behind the system LPM, the logic of plurals and mass terms, as it is described in Link (1983). Since I shall be concerned with plurals only in this paper I’ll skip the mass term part of the system. The remaining logic might be called LP.
ALLEY
发表于 2025-3-25 14:16:54
Branching Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,The idea that branching of quantifiers occurs in natural languages originates with Hintikka (1973; reprinted in 1974). Hintikka gave several examples of English sentences whose logical analysis, he claimed, requires essential use of partially ordered quantifier prefixes, in particular the so-called .
未完成
发表于 2025-3-25 19:32:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3823/382249/382249_24.png
TATE
发表于 2025-3-26 00:01:21
Natural Language and Generalized Quantifier Theory,ng in semantics, in particular by the investigation of the algebraic properties of natural language quantifiers. Not debating the general relevance of the conceptions developed in GQT, I will try a critical revision of the empirical claims of the theory.
Brocas-Area
发表于 2025-3-26 00:39:28
978-1-55608-018-0D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987
伙伴
发表于 2025-3-26 05:18:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3823/382249/382249_27.png
秘传
发表于 2025-3-26 09:51:46
(hereinafter ), on the one hand, and the approach taken in Barwise and Perry (1983) (hereinafter ), on the other. The discussion focuses on problems of anaphora and its interaction with the theory of quantification embedded in these two accounts. However, I am also forced to touch on the is
证明无罪
发表于 2025-3-26 13:36:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3823/382249/382249_29.png
生锈
发表于 2025-3-26 16:50:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3823/382249/382249_30.png