BOOST
发表于 2025-3-28 15:58:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380574/380574_41.png
Neutral-Spine
发表于 2025-3-28 18:57:29
Why Play Logical Games? the lack of a convincing philosophical account of logical games, what it means to play them, for the proponent to win, etc., pointedly raised by Wilfrid Hodges as the ‘Dawkins question’. In this paper, I critically examine two available answers: after a brief discussion of an argument by Tennant ag
novelty
发表于 2025-3-28 23:56:10
On The Narrow Epistemology of Game-Theoretic Agentsanations shows that they do not conform to the belief-desire framework of action explanation. Epistemic characterization theorems (specifying sufficient conditions for game-theoretic solution concepts to obtain) are argued to be the canonical way to make game theory conform to that framework. The be
Jingoism
发表于 2025-3-29 03:14:06
Fallacies as Cognitive Virtuesric mission. In so doing, it has taken on in a quite general way a game-theoretic character, precisely as it was with the theory of syllogistic refutation in the . and ., where Aristotle develops winning strategies for disputations. The approach that the present authors take toward the logic of prac
热心助人
发表于 2025-3-29 11:19:04
A Strategic Perspective on if Gamesimperfect information. In this paper we set up a strategic framework for the evaluation of IF logic à la Hintikka and Sandu. We show that the traditional semantic interpretation of IF logic can be characterized in terms of Nash equilibria. We note that moving to the strategic framework we get rid of
奇思怪想
发表于 2025-3-29 14:15:09
Towards Evaluation Games for Fuzzy Logicszation of the evaluation games for classical logic. It is shown that it provides an interesting contribution to the model theory of fuzzy logics as, unlike the standard semantics, it can deal with the so-called non-safe models. The second kind of semantics makes explicit the intuition about fuzzy lo
LOPE
发表于 2025-3-29 19:09:17
Games, Quantification and Discourse Structure deal of attention has been paid to truth conditions, the contributions of quantifiers to the discourse have been little studied. This paper seeks to rectify this by developing a set of game rules that account both for the truth conditional and the discourse contributions of quantified expressions.