PATRI
发表于 2025-3-28 15:12:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380527/380527_41.png
他去就结束
发表于 2025-3-28 19:39:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380527/380527_42.png
可卡
发表于 2025-3-29 00:26:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380527/380527_43.png
北极人
发表于 2025-3-29 06:11:27
Intentional Identity Interpreted: A Case Study of the Relations among Quantifiers, Pronouns, and Prrd a solution to Geach‘s puzzle in the sense that I shall present semantics for the kind of reading which, I will argue, was intended by Geach. In both these problem areas the discussion is (to the best of my knowledge) the first systematic study available in the literature.
growth-factor
发表于 2025-3-29 07:13:43
Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated, great deal of important structure of our modal concepts. Of course a number of serious philosophical problems remain, some of which were recently discussed by Professor Dana Scott under the heading Ts There Life on Possible Worlds‘? By and large, this application of the possible worlds idea has nevertheless proved to be extremely illuminating.
无意
发表于 2025-3-29 11:46:53
Language-Games,is question, at least not on my own authority. Instead of putting forward a theory, I shall try to propose a model or paradigm for future theories falling within the purview of my title. I shall suggest that the most instructive actual examples of ties or links between a part of language and that as
侧面左右
发表于 2025-3-29 18:52:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380527/380527_47.png
DIKE
发表于 2025-3-29 21:54:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380527/380527_48.png
喷出
发表于 2025-3-30 00:21:27
Quantifiers in Natural Languages: Some Logical Problems,ow, formalized quantifiers and their generalizations have been studied extensively by logicians. In contrast, relatively little close attention has been paid to the peculiarities of the logical behavior of quantifiers in natural languages, in spite of the fact that quantifiers have figured conspicuo
弯腰
发表于 2025-3-30 05:47:31
,Game-Theoretic Semantics, Quantifiers and Truth: Comments on Professor Hintikka’s Paper,im about the quantifier ‘any‘ that he calls the . and some more general conclusions about grammaticality. I find myself with some queries about what he says in each one of these areas, and I shall take them in turn before returning to consider briefly some more general motivations for game-theoretic