HARDY
发表于 2025-3-21 17:07:37
书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0380513<br><br> <br><br>
土坯
发表于 2025-3-21 22:15:35
,Don’t Shoot The Trumpeter - He’s Doing His Best!,rly between them is discussed, along with alternative solutions that have been put forward. These solutions are criticized for the shared assumption that the object of distribution is utility rather than opportunity. The author proposes a different approach and works out its implications for the pro
胰脏
发表于 2025-3-22 00:58:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_3.png
身心疲惫
发表于 2025-3-22 05:54:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_4.png
破译
发表于 2025-3-22 09:10:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_5.png
Hot-Flash
发表于 2025-3-22 16:11:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_6.png
Hot-Flash
发表于 2025-3-22 19:37:48
,Disparate Goods and Rawls’ Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment,someone is is to be measured by an ‘index’ of ‘primary social goods’. It is this index that gives content to the principle, and Rawls gives no adequate directions for constructing it. In this essay a version of the difference principle is proposed that fits much of what Rawls says, but that makes us
截断
发表于 2025-3-23 00:52:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_8.png
ESPY
发表于 2025-3-23 04:37:21
Decision-Making Under Ignorance with Implications for Social Choice,n the first section the author introduces a set of properties which might characterize a criterion for decision-making under complete ignorance. Two of these properties are novel: ‘independence of non-discriminating states’, and ‘weak pessimism’. The second section provides a new characterization of
总
发表于 2025-3-23 07:31:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3806/380513/380513_10.png