Ascendancy
发表于 2025-3-26 23:50:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_31.png
和平主义
发表于 2025-3-27 03:43:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_32.png
不遵守
发表于 2025-3-27 07:51:05
Skin, Chin, Cheek, and Foreheadrejects all the proposals whereby only the presence of a vital principle internal to the organism can explain the generation and development of the living being. Galen’s philosophy of life is thus associated with that of Van Helmont.
BADGE
发表于 2025-3-27 12:23:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_34.png
社团
发表于 2025-3-27 17:33:10
The Use of Parts: Mechanism Versus Galen,rejects all the proposals whereby only the presence of a vital principle internal to the organism can explain the generation and development of the living being. Galen’s philosophy of life is thus associated with that of Van Helmont.
出来
发表于 2025-3-27 20:50:51
Book 2022o the humanistic rediscovery of his works, the influence of the great ancient physician on Western thought seemed to decline rapidly as new discoveries made his anatomy, physiology, and therapeutics more and more obsolete. In fact, even though Galenism was gradually dismissed as a system, several of
fastness
发表于 2025-3-28 01:02:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_37.png
FRONT
发表于 2025-3-28 04:42:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_38.png
crumble
发表于 2025-3-28 07:20:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380372/380372_39.png
STING
发表于 2025-3-28 13:18:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16127-3 representation of their creation as the molding of unformed materials. Accordingly, Leibniz agrees with Galen that a Creator did his best in making our bodies, but he disagrees profoundly on the exact implications of this very general claim.