圆锥体
发表于 2025-3-30 10:00:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42562-6sms are not immune from critique. Problems appear regarding the standard of protection provided for research subject rights, regarding the disproportionate impact on legitimate interests tied up with the biobanking process—particularly genomic research interests—and regarding their practical implementability in biobanking.
Spartan
发表于 2025-3-30 13:59:08
,Periodische Einflüsse auf die Fehlzeiten,the GDPR and the Danish Data Protection Act it seems that research participants’ rights have been slightly weakened in Danish law. However, it is argued, that the GDPR has the potential to ensure more awareness of research participants right against the societal and scientific interest in research.
Asperity
发表于 2025-3-30 18:48:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3801/380066/380066_53.png
移动
发表于 2025-3-31 00:32:22
The Impact of the GDPR on the Governance of Biobank Researchnts in helping the biobanks in improving the data access governance. In addition, we stress that it is important to ensure the existing and emerging oversight bodies are equipped with adequate expertise regarding using and sharing health and genomic data and are aware of the associated informational risks.
充满人
发表于 2025-3-31 03:46:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3801/380066/380066_55.png
未完成
发表于 2025-3-31 05:29:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3801/380066/380066_56.png
Accord
发表于 2025-3-31 09:23:45
The Regulation of Biobanking in Germany the Regulation raises novel issues in its own right. In this paper, I will outline the fragmented nature of biobank regulation in Germany, illustrate the issues on the basis of Germany’s population biobank NaKo and then discuss some of the more significant issues raised by the GDPR in the context of biobanking.