6Applepolish 发表于 2025-3-25 03:21:59
The Lived Experience of Intense Conflict to be stated explicitly and its implications understood. Searle (2004, p. 28) writes that “‘Intentionality’ is a technical term used by philosophers to refer to that capacity of the mind by which mental states refer to, or are about, or are of objects and states of affairs in the world other than ttransdermal 发表于 2025-3-25 09:59:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_22.png不可知论 发表于 2025-3-25 15:06:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_23.png行业 发表于 2025-3-25 18:43:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_24.pngCumbersome 发表于 2025-3-25 23:00:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_25.pngOFF 发表于 2025-3-26 01:51:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_26.pngsurmount 发表于 2025-3-26 05:57:38
Performance indicators properties,vals, so I would now like to suggest that the distinction between teleological behaviorism and picoeconomics lies in the various functions they fulfill rather than in their competing for the same explanatory ground. For, if I have placed teleological behaviorism in the region of intentional behaviorVasodilation 发表于 2025-3-26 08:39:02
Einleitung und Problemstellung,e, and certainly amenable to scientific understanding. And, despite their differences, each of the three behaviorisms we have considered makes a unique contribution to the explanation of consumer choice in light of the three reasons why we need an intentional account once we leave the realms of pred取消 发表于 2025-3-26 13:52:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_29.png模仿 发表于 2025-3-26 19:30:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3218/321756/321756_30.png