儿童 发表于 2025-3-25 03:50:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3205/320430/320430_21.pngelectrolyte 发表于 2025-3-25 10:39:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3205/320430/320430_22.pngINTER 发表于 2025-3-25 12:10:30
,The European Union’s Role in Global Health: Embracing Governance Complexity?,ecture, have elicited Europeanist, Atlanticist and nationalist responses within the EU and its Member States. We find that European actors tend to signal a rejection of fragmentation in global health governance, while accepting it in practice.统治人类 发表于 2025-3-25 18:03:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3205/320430/320430_24.png一起平行 发表于 2025-3-25 23:05:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3205/320430/320430_25.png江湖郎中 发表于 2025-3-26 01:24:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20462-5ut the direction and applicability of ESA rendered this impracticable. A handful of EU actors believed this could be an effective answer but the majority of member states were less keen to breathe life into the idea: whereas lip service to a vague concept was acceptable, committing to its implementation was not.Ordeal 发表于 2025-3-26 06:56:00
Kosovo: Implementing Solutions,iative’s motivations and the array of perspectives within the EU. It highlights the tensions between geopolitical and developmental motivations, the search for partners and allies beyond Europe, and the reverberations of intra-EU power dynamics on the initiative’s trajectory.SUE 发表于 2025-3-26 10:55:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3205/320430/320430_28.pngLedger 发表于 2025-3-26 14:05:15
,Strategic Autonomy in Security and Defence as an Impracticability? How the European Union’s Rhetoriut the direction and applicability of ESA rendered this impracticable. A handful of EU actors believed this could be an effective answer but the majority of member states were less keen to breathe life into the idea: whereas lip service to a vague concept was acceptable, committing to its implementation was not.Restenosis 发表于 2025-3-26 20:26:44
The Global Gateway: Connectivity and Competition in the Global Race for Infrastructures,iative’s motivations and the array of perspectives within the EU. It highlights the tensions between geopolitical and developmental motivations, the search for partners and allies beyond Europe, and the reverberations of intra-EU power dynamics on the initiative’s trajectory.