supplementary 发表于 2025-3-21 16:29:00
书目名称Explorations of the Life-World影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explorations of the Life-World读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0320227<br><br> <br><br>set598 发表于 2025-3-21 22:17:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320227/320227_2.png尖叫 发表于 2025-3-22 01:40:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85901-3f the scientists. Theory of science is about basic concepts and methods. For Schutz, all science is theoretical, which makes the question of application clearer, and cultural science addresses the field of objects always already interpreted in everyday life. Scientifically social science differs froForage饲料 发表于 2025-3-22 07:54:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87927-1the social sciences and to an extent even in philosophy. However, much debate and even entrenched positions in regard to them in the social sciences primarily occur only by a reliance upon their mediated reinterpretation as abstract units within later theories and without regard to their original emhysterectomy 发表于 2025-3-22 09:45:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04492-3this aim, I first discuss the methodological postulates formulated by Schutz for the construction of social scientific constructs, considering their relations as well as his intention in formulating each of them. Second, I paraphrase his arguments about “types of knowledge,” i.e., the “expert,” the剥皮 发表于 2025-3-22 13:24:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81905-5 purposes for which each of these sociologists made use of the construct. Weber’s focus on substantive empirical historical and comparative problems led him to select the ideal type as a methodology suited for making comparisons between the type and empirical reality..Schutz’s original interest in t剥皮 发表于 2025-3-22 18:33:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320227/320227_7.png诙谐 发表于 2025-3-22 21:24:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13186-1 a comparison of Arendt’s “space of appearance” with Schutz’s “musical space.” I conclude that they have similarities as well as differences in two respects: first, both indicate a space of common appearances in direct communication within the actual reach, that is, the space being seen and heard siAudiometry 发表于 2025-3-23 03:52:54
Michael Kleinaltenkamp,Wulff Plinke be understood as a synthesis of forms of speech, action and thought whose basic structures can be disclosed by the means of Schutzian theory of the life-world. It is shown that the Schutzian approach, stressing the innerwordly transcendence of multiple realities on the one hand and the necessity tochance 发表于 2025-3-23 06:05:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07893-7ecognize the significance of this interpretation, yet I question whether practical action alone is sufficient to explain the variety of life-world experiences. The long neglected notions like transcendence and appresentation in Schutz are explored in this paper to treat this question.