送秋波 发表于 2025-3-26 22:54:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_31.pngBRAND 发表于 2025-3-27 03:39:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_32.png难管 发表于 2025-3-27 06:32:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_33.png做方舟 发表于 2025-3-27 09:25:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_34.pngneologism 发表于 2025-3-27 17:35:06
Howard NicholasThe first book in a three-volume series focused in-depth on Marx‘s economics.Demonstrates shortcomings in mainstream explanations of prices.Illuminates the importance of Marx‘s emphasis on the role ofaffinity 发表于 2025-3-27 21:47:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_36.pngmonogamy 发表于 2025-3-28 00:49:08
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023猜忌 发表于 2025-3-28 03:13:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3203/320204/320204_38.pngincisive 发表于 2025-3-28 09:39:39
Markenaudit für Kulturinstitutionenodity as that set by producers on the basis of unit money costs of production, taking into account the prices set by producers of the bulk of the commodities of the type they are producing. Marx sees the unit money costs of producing a commodity as fundamentally determined by the labour time that nePreserve 发表于 2025-3-28 12:54:19
Entwicklung des Forschungsmodells,n. The basic argument I develop is that Smith’s conception of the value of the commodity causes him to have logically inconsistent and counterintuitive explanations of the relative money prices of commodities and the aggregate money price level. It causes him to explain the relative money prices of