情感
发表于 2025-3-25 03:44:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_21.png
Multiple
发表于 2025-3-25 10:30:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_22.png
Paradox
发表于 2025-3-25 12:14:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_23.png
uveitis
发表于 2025-3-25 19:10:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_24.png
indignant
发表于 2025-3-25 23:22:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_25.png
Merited
发表于 2025-3-26 00:29:31
Semantics is not Ontologyogy determines success conditions for this fusion: it dictates that the reference of universal terms must exist if they are to be meaningful and logically usable. Yet, says Aristotle, the reference of these terms cannot really exist: universal objects cannot really exist: they are not objects. And s
玩笑
发表于 2025-3-26 06:43:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_27.png
Systemic
发表于 2025-3-26 08:41:14
The Conflation of the Source with the True, Good and Beautiful (Source)at legitimate, complex, concepts spawn science: they spawn all first principles and, thus, all syllogisms. Science is the (true) taxonomy of reality and it is given, in its entirety, by the very list of legitimate concepts. How is this list given to us, then? We have mentioned that taxonomy rests on
欢腾
发表于 2025-3-26 14:12:32
Induction as Spell-Castingtaxonomies and syllogisms which science comprises. The extraction of such syllogisms out of the concepts and taxonomies that contain them is Aristotelian logic. Syllogisms justify and explain the very taxonomies which they extract. (Strictly speaking, first principles need no justification and no ex
名义上
发表于 2025-3-26 20:22:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319852/319852_30.png