细节
发表于 2025-3-23 13:41:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319840/319840_11.png
overreach
发表于 2025-3-23 16:33:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-920-3ificant leaks? 2) Do female scientists depart from natural science / academia for alternative pursuits? The chapter also unveils the key findings and their impact on women in science, highlighting the thesis‘s broader significance.
征服
发表于 2025-3-23 20:35:28
Materials and Methods,istical analysis of national and international agencies and institutes, as well as the setup of an international qualitative study, with a focus on study design, execution, and participant selection. This chapter forms the methodological foundation of the master’s project.
ALTER
发表于 2025-3-23 22:20:30
Results, chapter also unveils the results from the international qualitative study, which encompasses participants‘ backgrounds, future aspirations, perceptions of academia, reasons to stay or leave, and beliefs about female underrepresentation. These experience-based findings serve as the foundation for our later discussion.
职业拳击手
发表于 2025-3-24 04:13:29
Limitations,s, cross-comparability, insufficient description, and the data collection timeframe are discussed for the former. For the latter, limitations included size, underrepresentation of women from Africa and South America, participant associations, and the lack of male participants.
挣扎
发表于 2025-3-24 06:43:22
Conclusion and Greater Benefit,ificant leaks? 2) Do female scientists depart from natural science / academia for alternative pursuits? The chapter also unveils the key findings and their impact on women in science, highlighting the thesis‘s broader significance.
吞吞吐吐
发表于 2025-3-24 13:00:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3199/319840/319840_17.png
Angiogenesis
发表于 2025-3-24 16:30:03
Extending the Complexity of the Leaky Pipeline Phenomenon in Natural Science978-3-658-43086-3Series ISSN 2625-3577 Series E-ISSN 2625-3615
cacophony
发表于 2025-3-24 19:40:02
BestMastershttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/319840.jpg
供过于求
发表于 2025-3-25 02:20:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43086-3Vertical Segregation; Communal Goal Affordance; STEM; Women in Science; Leaky Pipeline