squander
发表于 2025-3-23 12:43:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-01400-9 too: in the first, Schutz is concerned primarily with “making” (poiesis), whereas Arendt is concerned with “doing” (praxis). This difference is due to the fact that the space for Schutz is one of (polythetic) sound, whereas for Arendt, it is that of (monothetic) speech.
持续
发表于 2025-3-23 15:26:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3195/319436/319436_12.png
Outmoded
发表于 2025-3-23 18:26:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3195/319436/319436_13.png
否认
发表于 2025-3-23 23:03:01
0923-9545 cial sciences.Also comprises the ethics and political theoryThis anthology originated from three conferences, which were held at Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, on March 26-28, 1999, at the Univ- sity of Konstanz, Germany, on May 26-29, 1999 and a session at the SPHS annual meeting at the Universit
Aggrandize
发表于 2025-3-24 04:10:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3195/319436/319436_15.png
Culmination
发表于 2025-3-24 08:28:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3195/319436/319436_16.png
奇思怪想
发表于 2025-3-24 11:21:57
The Appeal of Alfred Schutz in Disciplines beyond Philosophy, e.g. Jurisprudencef the scientists. Theory of science is about basic concepts and methods. For Schutz, all science is theoretical, which makes the question of application clearer, and cultural science addresses the field of objects always already interpreted in everyday life. Scientifically social science differs fro
WITH
发表于 2025-3-24 17:51:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3195/319436/319436_18.png
farewell
发表于 2025-3-24 21:54:36
Between the Everyday Life-World and the World of Social Scientific Theory—Towards an “Adequate” Socithis aim, I first discuss the methodological postulates formulated by Schutz for the construction of social scientific constructs, considering their relations as well as his intention in formulating each of them. Second, I paraphrase his arguments about “types of knowledge,” i.e., the “expert,” the
aerobic
发表于 2025-3-24 23:27:40
The Ideal Type in Weber and Schutz purposes for which each of these sociologists made use of the construct. Weber’s focus on substantive empirical historical and comparative problems led him to select the ideal type as a methodology suited for making comparisons between the type and empirical reality..Schutz’s original interest in t