collude
发表于 2025-3-21 19:48:56
书目名称Explanation and Social Theory影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Explanation and Social Theory读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0319345<br><br> <br><br>
Agility
发表于 2025-3-21 21:28:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319345/319345_2.png
multiply
发表于 2025-3-22 03:43:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319345/319345_3.png
Evolve
发表于 2025-3-22 04:49:27
Action and Structure,idealistic’ elements in . forms, but believe that Weber’s division of these forms and his acceptance that they cannot be integrated is a weakness of his analysis which is unnecessary. They all believe that the division of the forms of action has produced a rigid, mechanical and oppressive account of
ERUPT
发表于 2025-3-22 11:40:30
Rationality and Action,ffered in the previous chapter, modern Weberians were associated with the horizontal fallacy and modern Marxists with the vertical fallacy, but the connections between them can be traced from either position.
FILTH
发表于 2025-3-22 15:01:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319345/319345_6.png
FILTH
发表于 2025-3-22 20:41:18
Lehr- und Lernmittel für Blindeffered in the previous chapter, modern Weberians were associated with the horizontal fallacy and modern Marxists with the vertical fallacy, but the connections between them can be traced from either position.
Favorable
发表于 2025-3-22 22:14:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319345/319345_8.png
cluster
发表于 2025-3-23 04:23:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319345/319345_9.png
Diskectomy
发表于 2025-3-23 06:38:07
Conclusion,ther aspect of a dualism can be abandoned for the other because the contradictory form sets each as an entailment to the other. Sooner or later, efforts at synthesis are shown to be equally ill-founded and, ultimately, the contradiction, initially argued to be unnecessary, is embraced as definitive.