graphy 发表于 2025-3-25 03:27:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_21.png

critic 发表于 2025-3-25 09:05:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_22.png

Adulate 发表于 2025-3-25 12:31:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_23.png

myocardium 发表于 2025-3-25 17:00:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_24.png

否决 发表于 2025-3-25 23:53:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_25.png

下级 发表于 2025-3-26 01:41:51

0166-6991 d news for all of game theory, though. Two central research programmes in game theory tried to find the ultimate characterisation of strategic interaction between rational agents. Yet, while the Nash Equilibriu978-94-007-3331-2978-1-4020-9906-9Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

协定 发表于 2025-3-26 04:48:32

Book 2010ve device. A provocative account of the history of game theory reveals that this is not bad news for all of game theory, though. Two central research programmes in game theory tried to find the ultimate characterisation of strategic interaction between rational agents. Yet, while the Nash Equilibriu

nauseate 发表于 2025-3-26 11:32:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_28.png

GRAVE 发表于 2025-3-26 14:42:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_29.png

definition 发表于 2025-3-26 18:54:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319323/319323_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Explaining Games; The Epistemic Progra Boudewijn de Bruin Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Epistemic logic.Games.Knowled