sperse
发表于 2025-3-25 05:07:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319265/319265_21.png
Ejaculate
发表于 2025-3-25 09:53:28
Siddhartha Chib,Yasuhiro Omori,Manabu Asaise is not atypical of many other judgment tasks. Finally, I will use what has gone before to broaden and clarify the contingency model of judgment and underscore its relevance to understanding and supporting judgmental expertise.
胆大
发表于 2025-3-25 13:20:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319265/319265_23.png
ONYM
发表于 2025-3-25 19:49:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319265/319265_24.png
剧毒
发表于 2025-3-25 22:48:12
Brian J. Meacham,Margaret McNameeult (1970). Nor is the intention to explore all relevant theories with the aim of reaching some conclusive outcome on the nature of expertise. Rather, the objective is to suggest a way forward for developing a theoretical framework as a tool for understanding the nature of expertise as it is practiced. To this end, empirical data are presented.
landmark
发表于 2025-3-26 03:16:29
Sociological Perspectives on the Nature of Expertiseult (1970). Nor is the intention to explore all relevant theories with the aim of reaching some conclusive outcome on the nature of expertise. Rather, the objective is to suggest a way forward for developing a theoretical framework as a tool for understanding the nature of expertise as it is practiced. To this end, empirical data are presented.
critic
发表于 2025-3-26 06:47:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319265/319265_27.png
厚颜无耻
发表于 2025-3-26 12:29:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319265/319265_28.png
伪善
发表于 2025-3-26 14:43:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7450-0ges into a single estimate, while “behavioral” approaches allow the full interaction of group members until some form of consensus is achieved, and “mixed” type involves components of both these approaches.
野蛮
发表于 2025-3-26 19:04:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7076-2nce that the mathematical aggregation of judgments from several individuals (collected as a “statistized,” “nominal,” or “noninteracting” group) usually would be better than the accuracy expected by randomly selecting a single individual from the population of all prospective group members (Bruce, 1935; Gordon, 1924; Knight, 1921).