脱离 发表于 2025-3-23 11:20:14
Susanne Kuger,Katharina Kluczniokce is so pervading that it can be asked whether God is not the being of all beings, the “I am” of every being. An affirmative answer could be understood as a doctrine of incarnation, a generalization escaping generalization in so far as the universal accepted responsibility for realization in the pa身体萌芽 发表于 2025-3-23 15:33:22
,Ausgangsüberlegungen und die Fragestellung,e creative presence of man its full range as a finite purpose participating an infinite purpose. The integrity of both the One and the Many is preserved through a participation which can be understood as a coincidence of purpose. The existential situation is a dialectical relation or tension in whicharpsichord 发表于 2025-3-23 21:54:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9074-9Christianity; Religion; bibliography; body; corpus; creativity; dialectic; experience; immortality; interpret机构 发表于 2025-3-24 01:27:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318556/318556_14.png啜泣 发表于 2025-3-24 04:28:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318556/318556_15.pngchance 发表于 2025-3-24 08:10:33
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318556.jpgANTIC 发表于 2025-3-24 14:42:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318556/318556_17.png圆木可阻碍 发表于 2025-3-24 17:08:45
God and Nature,n be unveiled. Nature is meaningful for man because Nature as Fact is grounded in a single purpose flowing from the Divine Mind. Nature . God manifesting Himself concretely. This subject . discussed in Professor Hocking’s unpublished Gifford Lectures of 1938–39, and outlined in an article entitled “ostracize 发表于 2025-3-24 19:04:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318556/318556_19.pngFacilities 发表于 2025-3-24 23:26:48
Susanne Kuger,Katharina Kluczniokkes of himself and the world is not God. No single individual being, nor the sum of all such beings is equivalent to God. God is intimate to all that is, but He is also infinitely ‘beyond” all that is.