Influx
发表于 2025-3-25 04:10:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3176/317504/317504_21.png
corpus-callosum
发表于 2025-3-25 09:47:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3176/317504/317504_22.png
APRON
发表于 2025-3-25 13:30:08
Nanostructure Science and Technologyrmine whether evidence is logically relevant to a matter requiring proof the judge must formulate a generalisation from his own experience and what he understands to be conventional wisdom (see 3.1.1 .). The problem is that some aspects of human life are more widely understood than others, and what
Ovulation
发表于 2025-3-25 18:01:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3176/317504/317504_24.png
adjacent
发表于 2025-3-25 23:51:34
erlying principles and policy considerations which explain w.Evidence. is a student-oriented approach to the subject in a market dominated by overly detailed and weighty books.It explains in depth the principles and policies which have influenced the evolution of the law, examining the fundamentals
Endearing
发表于 2025-3-26 00:23:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3176/317504/317504_26.png
南极
发表于 2025-3-26 06:40:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3176/317504/317504_27.png
BAN
发表于 2025-3-26 09:43:53
Emerging Methods in Family Researchect to specific exceptions) because the possibility of mistake or fabrication renders such evidence generally unreliable. Confessions are inadmissible if obtained in consequence of torture or other oppressive interrogatory techniques because a person should not be forced into incriminating himself.
Debate
发表于 2025-3-26 14:09:45
Diana P. Baumann,Andrew Ingalls to prove any disputed issue of fact, what is meant by ‘proof’ in this context, what happens when there is no evidence in support of or against a particular factual proposition, and the extent to which the tribunal of fact can rely on its own knowledge.
传授知识
发表于 2025-3-26 17:13:28
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450661charged, such cross-examination is only indirectly relevant to his guilt. It is intended to show that because of his dissolute character his testimony, and therefore his defence, should not be believed by the jury or magistrates.