刺耳 发表于 2025-3-28 14:46:37
Evaluating New Technologies978-90-481-2229-5Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036赞美者 发表于 2025-3-28 19:32:09
Paul Sollie,Marcus DüwellTakes a proactive attitude towards dealing with complex new technology developments.Focus on uncertainty in ethics and technology, which is, contrary to the concept of risk, highly underappreciated in大量 发表于 2025-3-28 23:06:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317234/317234_43.pngALB 发表于 2025-3-29 05:29:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5Ethical Technology Assessment; Ethical Theory; Precaution and precautionary principle; Technology Devel不发音 发表于 2025-3-29 09:41:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317234/317234_45.png单独 发表于 2025-3-29 14:35:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317234/317234_46.pngendoscopy 发表于 2025-3-29 17:18:01
Heart Rate and Physiological Ecologyctive. We begin with the historical context by describing developments both in information technology and ethics that preceded Value-Sensitive Design. Both ethics and computer science demonstrate a converging development towards interest in the relation between values and technical design, respectiv吵闹 发表于 2025-3-29 20:40:23
Gül Nilhan Tuğ,Ahmet Emre Yapraknt, and it analyzes the ethical dimensions of technology itself. First, the chapter addresses the question of how to conceptualize and assess the moral significance of technological artifacts. If technologies help to shape moral actions and decisions, how to understand and evaluate this moral role oSynovial-Fluid 发表于 2025-3-30 03:35:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8496-6icists working together, but also by an increasing attention, from both sides, to the very nature of their cooperation. The debate on this topic has been ongoing for more than twenty years, but in the last years the discussion became more intense. However, one can doubt whether up until now the rele连系 发表于 2025-3-30 05:16:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9619-9levels, and shows its epistemic neighbourhood to the scenario-techniques. In general, the central idea of a “future technology” is critically analyzed, backed with central examples drawn from nanotechnology, human doping techniques, and social neuroscience. Main concepts that are used for critique a