ARCH
发表于 2025-3-27 00:41:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_31.png
DNR215
发表于 2025-3-27 02:56:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_32.png
护身符
发表于 2025-3-27 08:43:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_33.png
不规则的跳动
发表于 2025-3-27 10:10:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28150-9f her arguments, endorsing Eva’s criticism of Williamson’s analysis of Dummett and developing a suggestion by Manuel García-Carpintero on a speech act analysis of pejoratives. Eva’s main concern is accounting for our instinctive refusal to endorse an assertion containing pejoratives because it sugge
遗弃
发表于 2025-3-27 17:12:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_35.png
evaculate
发表于 2025-3-27 17:52:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_36.png
宫殿般
发表于 2025-3-28 00:10:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_37.png
营养
发表于 2025-3-28 04:41:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3172/317184/317184_38.png
commune
发表于 2025-3-28 09:53:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28920-5ect her identification of Chomsky’s notion of “tacit knowledge” of language with Dummett’s notion of implicit knowledge, and I argue that Eva’s (and Dummett’s) criticism of the latter notion does not apply to the former. In the second part of the paper, I take Eva’s side in criticizing individualism
香料
发表于 2025-3-28 13:49:04
J. H. Lawton,J. R. Beddington,R. BonserStanley and Williamson and finds them wanting. Afterwards, it presents Chomsky’s position on linguistic competence as a form of propositional knowledge. It criticizes both the theoretical and the empirical arguments Chomsky puts forward in favor of his view and presents some observations in favor of