平 发表于 2025-3-25 07:17:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_21.pngcreatine-kinase 发表于 2025-3-25 08:25:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17588-7t. But with 1992 shortly to become a reality, self-obsession and retrospection gave way to a new focus on Europe and on the future. In the words of President Mitterrand, ‘France is our country, . .’.. And as the last echoes of the Marseillaise died away, a new refrain was heard in France: ‘On va gagBORE 发表于 2025-3-25 12:36:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_23.pngInterim 发表于 2025-3-25 18:42:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_24.png过分 发表于 2025-3-25 20:36:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67392-9ought in their wake war, occupation, devastation and humiliation, and the chill winds and hailstorms of the 1950s, which engendered retreat, indignity, fear and insecurity, President de Gaulle swiftly brought about a radically different security climate. The 1960s offered a traumatised nation the twInflammation 发表于 2025-3-26 01:26:48
Tri-Duality in Nonconvex Systemsght, as if by magic, the German nation was able to reconstitute a unity which even the most optimistic of its advocates had seen as at best a very long-term project. What will be the future of the new Germany’s foreign and security policy and what will be the consequences for the rest of Europe?正常 发表于 2025-3-26 07:02:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_27.png委托 发表于 2025-3-26 10:05:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_28.pngBILK 发表于 2025-3-26 14:59:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3171/317049/317049_29.pngdefenses 发表于 2025-3-26 20:01:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67392-9ed the political function of the other. It was a symbiotic relationship in which both were permanent winners. In the maelstrom of post-war history, the major issue for France was the redefinition of her international role. This quest precluded for several decades any structured relationship with her European neighbours