Capture
发表于 2025-3-23 11:34:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316983/316983_11.png
Mere仅仅
发表于 2025-3-23 15:08:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5499-0 the three European Union (EU) natural gas directives in 1998, 2003, and 2009. Herweg highlights new research questions, which evolved from her analysis, and concludes that considering that the MSF’s concepts were transferred one to one from the United States to the EU, there are relatively few assumptions calling for theoretical refinements.
松软
发表于 2025-3-23 18:56:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316983/316983_13.png
云状
发表于 2025-3-24 00:14:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316983/316983_14.png
heckle
发表于 2025-3-24 05:21:20
The First Gas Directive Process,nges had kept the agenda window open and made the problem stream ripe. It needed two decision windows in order to pass the draft directive. The first window closed because of a deadlock, and the second one opened due to a spillover from the electricity directive process, which was negotiated in parallel.
固执点好
发表于 2025-3-24 08:11:43
The Second Gas Directive Process,by 2004. It remains unclear why the Commission did not include energy liberalization in its working program, which it had published barely two months before. Given that all policy-makers supported the agenda change, no policy-entrepreneur was required to couple the streams and this shortened decision coupling.
有恶意
发表于 2025-3-24 12:57:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316983/316983_17.png
TSH582
发表于 2025-3-24 18:33:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316983/316983_18.png
endure
发表于 2025-3-24 19:42:10
European Union Policy-Making978-3-319-49400-5Series ISSN 2524-7301 Series E-ISSN 2524-731X
为现场
发表于 2025-3-25 01:09:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49400-5Agenda setting; Multiple streams; Policy change; Public Policy; European Politics; Regulation; european un