淘气 发表于 2025-3-23 12:07:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_11.pngMisgiving 发表于 2025-3-23 14:15:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_12.png允许 发表于 2025-3-23 18:10:26
Prakash Ranganathan,Kendall E. Nygardt policy. This chapter draws together the various strands of the previous discussion in order to chart the course of and summarise the reasons for EC intervention in Central America. An assessment is offered as to how effective the EC was in meeting its objectives. The practical and theoretical significance of the policy is also evaluated.CAMP 发表于 2025-3-23 23:35:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_14.pngTERRA 发表于 2025-3-24 06:23:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_15.png仔细阅读 发表于 2025-3-24 08:05:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_16.png松软无力 发表于 2025-3-24 12:05:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_17.pngAnterior 发表于 2025-3-24 17:11:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3170/316980/316980_18.pngexplicit 发表于 2025-3-24 21:40:15
System Calibration calibration,al relations and to help West European businesses exploit the potential markets of the sub-continent. The nearest the EC came to being involved in Latin American politics was in 1982, when for a few weeks it was able to provide a short-lived display of unity with Britain during the Falklands/Malvinageneric 发表于 2025-3-25 00:38:46
Philip Hallinger,Ronald H. Heckentation of EC policy towards Central America through to the waning of EC interest in late 1989 and early 1990. The chapter also contains a preliminary assessment as to whether (or not) and to what extent EC policy towards Central America achieved its own stated objectives. Some preliminary consider