incisive
发表于 2025-3-23 12:08:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3169/316892/316892_11.png
Commission
发表于 2025-3-23 15:04:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3169/316892/316892_12.png
llibretto
发表于 2025-3-23 21:50:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3169/316892/316892_13.png
死亡率
发表于 2025-3-24 00:06:52
The Future of Western European Security,satisfaction with existing defence policies has led to sustained mass campaigns against nuclear weapons in several countries. Opposition to Western Europe’s defence dependence on the United States has become deeper and more widespread since the 1979 triumph of the political right in the USA brought
Stricture
发表于 2025-3-24 05:15:27
The Security Debate in the Evangelical Church of the GDR,Nuclear Age’. for distribution exclusively to Church members. Its first section summarises the course of the Church debate on security issues from the mid-1970s to 1985 with impressive lucidity. The section concludes with a rejection of ‘the spirit, logic and practice of deterrence’.
流出
发表于 2025-3-24 07:36:43
The New Peace Movement and European Security, of a European nuclear-free zone, and specifically, the non-deployment and later removal of the Euro-missiles. But the underlying concerns were more profound. They had to do with the role of the state in modern society and the issue of national self-determination. The Euro-missile issue, in particul
Anticoagulant
发表于 2025-3-24 13:50:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3169/316892/316892_17.png
墙壁
发表于 2025-3-24 16:06:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3169/316892/316892_18.png
小丑
发表于 2025-3-24 20:01:36
The Debate on European Security in the United Kingdom, overlapping arguments about defence policy, defence industries, Britain’s role in the world, and the future of political parties. Insofar as we can amalgamate these different debates into some sort of British ‘approach’ to European security, several contradictory trends are apparent. On the one han
最后一个
发表于 2025-3-25 02:35:21
European Security: Hungarian Interpretations, Perceptions and Foreign Policy,en ‘common’, ‘mutual’, ‘equal’, and ‘cooperative’ security, is effectively non-existent, whilst alternative notions such as non-offensive defence have yet to acquire real intellectual currency. Nor is there public discussion by the various social or political groups of alternative security policies.