法官所用
发表于 2025-3-21 19:08:40
书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Euclid‘s Heritage. Is Space Three-Dimensional?读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0316428<br><br> <br><br>
Negotiate
发表于 2025-3-21 20:26:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_2.png
Fortuitous
发表于 2025-3-22 04:06:38
Book 1992 and Kant, to more recent philosophy. As you will learn, the historical theories are rife with terminology, with language, already tainted by the as sumed, but by no means obvious, clarity of terms like ‘dimension‘, ‘line‘, ‘point‘ and others. Prior to that language there are actions, ways of getti
我不重要
发表于 2025-3-22 06:26:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_4.png
nutrition
发表于 2025-3-22 12:05:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4962-4Principally new approaches come into view with the attempt to explain the three-dimensionality of space with laws of force. These approaches are science-analytical arguments in connection with empirical theories. To what extent is this type of argument “principally new?”
流利圆滑
发表于 2025-3-22 15:40:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0170-4The word “dimension” is one of those scientific technical expressions which has found a wide and diverse use in ordinary language. Does a language usage, scientific or extra-scientific, exist which would suggest a .
流利圆滑
发表于 2025-3-22 21:07:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_7.png
Liberate
发表于 2025-3-22 22:10:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_8.png
chisel
发表于 2025-3-23 04:44:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_9.png
煞费苦心
发表于 2025-3-23 05:49:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3165/316428/316428_10.png