保存
发表于 2025-3-23 10:33:57
Choosing to believe,ith an examination of the concept of belief in conversation with the view of J. L. Schellenberg. Next, against the dominant position in contemporary epistemology, it argues that some beliefs can be voluntary, in the sense that they are under the immediate control of the believer, and replies to Will
LAITY
发表于 2025-3-23 14:26:40
Can religious arguments ,?,fficient evidence.” (Clifford’s essay was originally published in . in 1877; it is presently in print in Madigan (1999)). One might claim that a corollary to Clifford’s Law is that it is wrong, always, everywhere, and for anyone, to withhold belief when faced with sufficient evidence. Seeming to ope
GIDDY
发表于 2025-3-23 18:10:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316081/316081_13.png
ensemble
发表于 2025-3-24 00:58:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316081/316081_14.png
MINT
发表于 2025-3-24 05:28:15
,D. Z. Phillips on the grammar of “God”,d the language game in some detail, discussing the confusion of “subliming” the logic of our language, the contextual genesis of sense and meaning, the idea of a world view, language game, logic, and grammar internal to each context, the constitution of the religious context, and the grammar of God
defenses
发表于 2025-3-24 10:12:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316081/316081_16.png
Accommodation
发表于 2025-3-24 11:05:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8377-8D; Z;Phillips; Ethics of belief; Rationality of religious belief; Religion; Religious language; ethics; th
Coronation
发表于 2025-3-24 18:39:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316081/316081_18.png
Interlocking
发表于 2025-3-24 20:07:36
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/316081.jpg
endocardium
发表于 2025-3-25 01:49:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316081/316081_20.png