exercise
发表于 2025-3-25 06:20:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315978/315978_21.png
Coronation
发表于 2025-3-25 10:37:53
Killing Persons and Other Beings the obligation still more. And we might ask whether it is only persons that we are obliged not to kill, or do we have such obligations to other beings as well? What I will argue is that consciousness, simple or reflexive, is sufficient for imposing on us a . obligation not to kill its subject.
不能仁慈
发表于 2025-3-25 13:06:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315978/315978_23.png
ellagic-acid
发表于 2025-3-25 17:04:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315978/315978_24.png
四牛在弯曲
发表于 2025-3-25 23:16:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53299-7his nonstandard case, then, we must scrutinize those ideas rather closely. Our habit of relying on our “intuitions” will not get us far, for those intuitions, I believe, push us in different directions when we try to extend them, and extension is necessary under the circumstances.
barium-study
发表于 2025-3-26 01:18:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315978/315978_26.png
吗啡
发表于 2025-3-26 07:52:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315978/315978_27.png
Gentry
发表于 2025-3-26 08:31:24
978-0-89603-053-4The HUMANA Press Inc. 1983
dagger
发表于 2025-3-26 14:48:27
Friedrich Eichhorn,Hans-Joachim Opperadition in Western thought most sympathetic to the claims and to the standing of nonhuman animals. For Aristotle, as for Darwin, man is one animal among the others, different surely, primary perhaps, but animal certainly.
本土
发表于 2025-3-26 18:01:37
‘Platonists’ and ‘Aristotelians’radition in Western thought most sympathetic to the claims and to the standing of nonhuman animals. For Aristotle, as for Darwin, man is one animal among the others, different surely, primary perhaps, but animal certainly.