织布机
发表于 2025-3-25 07:21:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_21.png
cipher
发表于 2025-3-25 09:38:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_22.png
银版照相
发表于 2025-3-25 14:31:09
The Epistemic Problem: Potential Solutions,d be a very strong case for saying that we should give to them. If such agencies do less good, and more harm, than they like to imply though, the case for giving to them would presumably be weaker. And if the effects of their work were bad enough, that case might break down altogether.
山间窄路
发表于 2025-3-25 19:13:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_24.png
minaret
发表于 2025-3-25 20:24:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_25.png
不利
发表于 2025-3-26 01:52:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_26.png
glomeruli
发表于 2025-3-26 04:30:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_27.png
系列
发表于 2025-3-26 11:16:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3160/315926/315926_28.png
租约
发表于 2025-3-26 13:47:26
The Epistemic Problem: Potential Solutions,ion, and CARE.. How should we respond to such appeals? Should we give to such agencies? Presumably, the answer to this question depends on how good or bad the effects of their work are.. If those effects are as positive as the fundraising literature of such agencies tends to suggest, then there woul
羊栏
发表于 2025-3-26 17:05:22
The Seeming Simplicity of Measurement*, volume in response to Peter Singer’s proposition (1999) that the rich have a moral obligation to assist the world’s poor and therefore should give a reasonable proportion of their income to those agencies whose aim it is to alleviate poverty and suffering. Horton’s challenge is that surely this mor