BALK
发表于 2025-3-23 11:17:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_11.png
阻止
发表于 2025-3-23 16:20:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_12.png
使增至最大
发表于 2025-3-23 18:31:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_13.png
体贴
发表于 2025-3-24 01:07:28
Norman Page (Professor of English)bjections to intuitionism. In essence, I have argued:.But the arguments establishing points (2) and (3) have been long and complex. In this chapter, I provide a brief review of the most important arguments for these theses. I then discuss why intuitionism has been unpopular, and why the issue is imp
Exuberance
发表于 2025-3-24 03:07:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_15.png
遗留之物
发表于 2025-3-24 08:32:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_16.png
持续
发表于 2025-3-24 13:12:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0073464Many anti-realists have charged that if moral realism were true, there would be . for acting morally. In this chapter, I argue instead that only the intuitionist has a plausible account of our reasons for being moral.
Pruritus
发表于 2025-3-24 17:39:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_18.png
清晰
发表于 2025-3-24 20:59:55
ReductionismIn the present chapter, I defend two main theses, as against the views of ethical reductionists: that at least some evaluative properties are irreducible, and that moral knowledge cannot be explained without appeal to ethical intuition.
富饶
发表于 2025-3-25 01:17:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3159/315891/315891_20.png