阴谋 发表于 2025-3-25 07:13:43
Conditio sine qua non in GeneralThe tortfeasor had provided the victim with a poisonous drink instead of a medicine, and the victim died as result of consuming the drink.LIMN 发表于 2025-3-25 09:06:34
Damage Caused by OmissionOne of two slaves of a tenant farmer had lit a furnace, and the other later fell asleep 1 when guarding the fire. The owner of the farm sued the slaves’ owner, because the fire burned the farm down.Feedback 发表于 2025-3-25 12:15:58
Damage Caused by Psychological InfluenceA slave had been persuaded by a third person to flee from his owner. The question arose whether this slave was legally to be regarded as a ., even if the slave would not have run away but for the advice of the third person.翻动 发表于 2025-3-25 19:13:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3155/315411/315411_24.png制度 发表于 2025-3-25 21:33:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3155/315411/315411_25.pngCoronation 发表于 2025-3-26 03:55:47
Damage Caused by Several Successive, but Independent Events Outside the Victim’s Sphere“A slave who had been wounded so gravely that he was certain to die of the injury was appointed someone’s heir and subsequently killed by a further blow from another assailant”.. The question was, whether both tortfeasors were liable for killing (.) under the ..hypotension 发表于 2025-3-26 05:52:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3155/315411/315411_27.png开始发作 发表于 2025-3-26 12:21:19
Springer-Verlag Vienna 2007considerable 发表于 2025-3-26 14:36:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9745-6 that it was out of service for 102 days. During this time the claimant put into service another tram-car that had been held in reserve. The claimant asserted that it had a number of tram-cars available especially for this type of contingency. Apart from the repair costs for the damaged tram-car, th生命 发表于 2025-3-26 17:49:49
Tax Policy: Tax Cuts Versus Tax Reformantee to make good any damage resulting from the dangerous state of his house and to offer security for this promise. Later, tiles had fallen off the roof in a storm, causing damage to the claimant’s property. The claimant then sued the defendant on the basis of the prior guarantee (.).