柳条筐
发表于 2025-3-21 19:45:08
书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0315310<br><br> <br><br>
伪造者
发表于 2025-3-21 20:42:56
A Note on Leibniz’s Argument Against Infinite WholesThe refutation of this argument by Russell and others is equally well known. In this note, I argue (against positions recently defended by Arthur, Breger, and Brown) for the following three claims: (1) Leibniz himself had all the means to devise and accept this refutation; (2) This refutation does n
谈判
发表于 2025-3-22 00:38:05
Monads and Sets: On Gödel, Leibniz, and the Reflection Principle the mathematical and philosophical background to Gödel’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for Gödel’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the
faucet
发表于 2025-3-22 07:49:05
Gödel’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibnizd but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for Gödel’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.
漫步
发表于 2025-3-22 09:46:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315310/315310_5.png
嘴唇可修剪
发表于 2025-3-22 13:14:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315310/315310_6.png
嘴唇可修剪
发表于 2025-3-22 17:37:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315310/315310_7.png
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-22 22:24:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315310/315310_8.png
Mortal
发表于 2025-3-23 01:41:41
Gödel and Intuitionismn Gödel’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of Gödel to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that Gödel already thought of t
致词
发表于 2025-3-23 07:43:01
Construction and Constitution in Mathematicsect coincide. Various objections to Brouwer’s intuitionism that have been raised in recent phenomenological literature (by Hill, Rosado Haddock, and Tieszen) are addressed. Then I present objections to Gödel’s project of founding classical mathematics on transcendental phenomenology. The problem for