Incise
发表于 2025-3-25 04:19:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_21.png
裂隙
发表于 2025-3-25 08:24:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_22.png
maroon
发表于 2025-3-25 13:35:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_23.png
锉屑
发表于 2025-3-25 18:28:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_24.png
chapel
发表于 2025-3-25 20:26:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_25.png
笨拙处理
发表于 2025-3-26 01:26:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_26.png
保守党
发表于 2025-3-26 06:41:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_27.png
松鸡
发表于 2025-3-26 09:18:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_28.png
Delude
发表于 2025-3-26 13:12:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315305/315305_29.png
宫殿般
发表于 2025-3-26 19:55:41
Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theoryly ethical theory proposing a reasonably clear, systematic, and purportedly rational concept of morality. I shall argue that Rawls’s attempt to suggest a viable alternative to utilitarianism does not succeed. Nevertheless, beyond any doubt, his book is a significant contribution to the ongoing debat