侵蚀 发表于 2025-3-28 17:58:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_41.png十字架 发表于 2025-3-28 21:59:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_42.pngcoagulate 发表于 2025-3-28 23:00:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_43.png可忽略 发表于 2025-3-29 04:38:25
Totality by Analogy; Or: The Limits of Law and Black Subjectivity,oppressed subject must, in some constitutive sense, be articulated both . and . the very Subject that historically excluded and oppressed it, a Subject whose deconstruction now becomes a condition for the possibility of the subject’s emancipation.CLAN 发表于 2025-3-29 08:04:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_45.png删除 发表于 2025-3-29 14:06:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_46.pngCHART 发表于 2025-3-29 16:48:17
Doing Philosophy in the African Place: A Perspective on the Language Challenge,y be done through foreign languages or indigenous African languages? This has become a problem which some members of the Particularist and Universalist schools in African philosophy have being wrestling with. While the Particularists favour the view, that African philosophy should be done using an i责问 发表于 2025-3-29 22:28:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_48.png闯入 发表于 2025-3-30 02:38:17
How Conversational Philosophy Profits from the Particularist and the Universalist Agenda,hy tradition. As a result, it has been able to overcome the lapses inherent in particularism, universalism and eclecticism/pluralism. I argue that conversational philosophy is a more robust approach than the above-mentioned approaches, which have the problems of uniqueness, aping of Western philosopFLINT 发表于 2025-3-30 04:07:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315299/315299_50.png